What is objection sustained?
In legal proceedings, an "Objection Sustained" ruling by the judge means the judge agrees with a lawyer's <a href="https://www.wikiwhat.page/kavramlar/objection">objection</a> to a question, testimony, or piece of evidence presented by the opposing side.
Key implications:
- The Question/Evidence is Excluded: When an objection is sustained, the question cannot be answered, the testimony is stricken from the record (meaning the jury is instructed to disregard it), or the evidence is not admitted.
- Purpose of Objections: Lawyers raise objections to prevent inadmissible evidence (e.g., hearsay, irrelevant information, speculation) from influencing the judge or jury.
- Impact on the Case: A sustained objection can significantly alter the course of a trial by limiting the information available to the decision-makers and affecting the opposing party's ability to prove their case.
- Reasons for Sustaining: A judge might sustain an objection for a variety of reasons, including violations of the rules of evidence, improper questioning techniques, or the potential for prejudice. Common objections include: <a href="https://www.wikiwhat.page/kavramlar/hearsay">hearsay</a>, <a href="https://www.wikiwhat.page/kavramlar/leading%20question">leading question</a>, lack of foundation, speculation, relevance, <a href="https://www.wikiwhat.page/kavramlar/best%20evidence%20rule">best evidence rule</a>, and privilege.
- Judge's Discretion: Ultimately, the decision to sustain or overrule an objection rests with the judge, who has broad discretion in applying the rules of evidence.